Re: [boost] Boost.Test - misc observations

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-14 01:42:12

"Jody Hagins" <jody-boost-011304_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:20060613115639.4a490dcc.jody-boost-011304_at_atdesk.com...
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 01:44:25 -0400
> "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
>> environment, where I do not have time/permission to build a library
>> on. Even  in this scenario I would rather use included version of UTF.

[...]

> Could you please help me locate more detailed instructions on how to use
> the "included" variant?  Also, I assume compile times are longer, but
> other than that, what do you lose, if anything, by using the included
> version?

Well. It supposed to be equivalent. And you get "included" version with a 
simple change from:

#define BOOST_TEST_MODULE my_test
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>

to:

#define BOOST_TEST_MODULE my_test
#include <boost/test/included/unit_test.hpp>

And everithing should still work as before. Whatever extra headers you had 
to include in case of offline library (like floating_point_comparison.hpp), 
they still need to be included separately.

Gennadiy