Boost logo

Boost :

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-14 01:42:12

"Jody Hagins" <jody-boost-011304_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 01:44:25 -0400
> "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> environment, where I do not have time/permission to build a library
>> on. Even in this scenario I would rather use included version of UTF.


> Could you please help me locate more detailed instructions on how to use
> the "included" variant? Also, I assume compile times are longer, but
> other than that, what do you lose, if anything, by using the included
> version?

Well. It supposed to be equivalent. And you get "included" version with a
simple change from:

#define BOOST_TEST_MODULE my_test
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>


#define BOOST_TEST_MODULE my_test
#include <boost/test/included/unit_test.hpp>

And everithing should still work as before. Whatever extra headers you had
to include in case of offline library (like floating_point_comparison.hpp),
they still need to be included separately.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at