Re: [boost] Bug/Incompatibility: Visual C++ 2005 checked iteratorslead to major crashes

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-15 13:22:09

"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Heh, I think we ought to think very carefully about changing our
>> default.
>
> I agree: normally our default is the same as the compiler's default,
> if you want to do something out of the ordinary then it's up to you
> to compile the lib's the way you want them.  I don't think there's
> any way we can provide every possible binary.

a. I don't think you're actually agreeing with me.  Maybe
   s/carefully/seriously/?

b. Normally our default is not the same as the compiler's default when
   the compiler's default is nonconformant, as it is in this case.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com