Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-15 13:22:09

"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Heh, I think we ought to think very carefully about changing our
>> default.
> I agree: normally our default is the same as the compiler's default,
> if you want to do something out of the ordinary then it's up to you
> to compile the lib's the way you want them. I don't think there's
> any way we can provide every possible binary.

a. I don't think you're actually agreeing with me. Maybe

b. Normally our default is not the same as the compiler's default when
   the compiler's default is nonconformant, as it is in this case.

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at