From: Yuval Ronen (ronen_yuval_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-15 17:26:58
David Abrahams wrote:
> b. Normally our default is not the same as the compiler's default when
> the compiler's default is nonconformant, as it is in this case.
What's nonconformant about these checked iterators (apart from the
warnings, which are annoying, but not nonconformant)?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk