Boost logo

Boost :

From: Yuval Ronen (ronen_yuval_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-20 01:48:24


David Abrahams wrote:
> Yuval Ronen <ronen_yuval_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> b. Normally our default is not the same as the compiler's default when
>>> the compiler's default is nonconformant, as it is in this case.
>> What's nonconformant about these checked iterators (apart from the
>> warnings, which are annoying, but not nonconformant)?
>
> They don't meet the complexity requirements (big-O) for iterators.

I asked this question at the Microsoft forums and the answer was that
release (checked) iterators are conformant, while debug iterators are
not - http://tinyurl.com/jwgvv.

I guess that if anyone thinks otherwise, MS people would be glad to here
about it...


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk