From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-15 18:25:04
Yuval Ronen <ronen_yuval_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> b. Normally our default is not the same as the compiler's default when
>> the compiler's default is nonconformant, as it is in this case.
> What's nonconformant about these checked iterators (apart from the
> warnings, which are annoying, but not nonconformant)?
They don't meet the complexity requirements (big-O) for iterators.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk