From: Frederick Akalin (akalin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-19 23:30:00
> Having rank also solves the following problem I was wondering about: how
> do you define vector scalar multiplication in a sufficiently restrictive
> way. Without a notion of rank, matrix * vector could be ambiguous with
> scalar * vector since (matrix * x, matrix * y, matrix * z) would be a
> vector<matrix<T> >.
Perhaps I'm horribly misunderstanding something, but wouldn't the fact
that "matrix<T> * vector<T>" has to return "vector<T>" be enough to
disambiguate it? Your example is implying that matrix<T> * vector<T>
can somehow return vector<matrix<T> >.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk