From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-22 17:34:35
Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
> "Peter Dimov" wrote:
>>> A bug report for __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ has been sent.
>> What do you mean by "working"? Does __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ not work?
>> 'Cause I already committed your suggestion to enable it. :-)
> It is the smallest of existing problems.
So what do you suggest we do with current_function.hpp? Use __FUNCTION__
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk