Re: [boost] [system][timer] CPU timer first draft

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-26 05:06:31

Jeff Garland wrote:
> Well, you're assuming that report will be called in a destructor.  If
> it isn't and some sort of exception is thrown then the application
> can't handle it because you've eaten it.  You could always have 2
> versions: 
> 
>     void cpu_time_reporter::report_no_exceptions() throws()
>     void cpu_time_reporter::report()

Or how about:

void cpu_time_reporter::report(std::nothrow_t)throw()  ?

It's situations like this that we have std::nothrow for isn't it?

Just a thought.

John.