Re: [boost] [system][timer] CPU timer first draft

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-26 08:33:42

John Maddock wrote:
> Jeff Garland wrote:
>> Well, you're assuming that report will be called in a destructor.  If
>> it isn't and some sort of exception is thrown then the application
>> can't handle it because you've eaten it.  You could always have 2
>> versions: 
>>
>>     void cpu_time_reporter::report_no_exceptions() throws()
>>     void cpu_time_reporter::report()
> 
> Or how about:
> 
> void cpu_time_reporter::report(std::nothrow_t)throw()  ?
> 
> It's situations like this that we have std::nothrow for isn't it?
> 
> Just a thought.

Yeah, that's a good idea :-)

Jeff