From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-27 04:45:13
| -----Original Message-----
| From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
| [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Martin Wille
| Sent: 27 June 2006 08:50
| To: boost_at_[hidden]
| Subject: Re: [boost] Spam filter policy?
| Markus Schöpflin wrote:
| > Martin Wille wrote:
| >> I also suggest subscribers who repeatedly violate that part of the
| >> policy get unsubscribed.
| > This would mean that subscribers would get banned without
| being able to
| > somehow change the situation. Granted, they could use a
| private mail
| > account or something similar, but this could not be
| possible as well.
| > I think just ignoring those mails is good enough.
| If the anti-spam challenges get ignored then the subscribers won't
| recceive any messages from the list, either.
It looked so kosher that I nearly clicked to reply, but then I hesitated,
and finally I assumed that the challenge was a fishing device for my email
address and didn't I didn't reply, and marked it as spam to Cloudmark.
I note that Cloudmark then automatically marked other similar messages as
spam, so I conclude that many other people have also come to the same
conclusion and marked it as such.
It MAY be well-intentioned, but I think it has already backfired on the
--- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB +44 1539561830 & SMS, Mobile +44 7714 330204 & SMS pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk