From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-05 10:26:39
Joel de Guzman wrote:
> Me, I prefer the immutable and functional approach:
> Yeah, for the record, I never liked the use of the |. With the
> plain functional syntax, the joke is very clear.
Of course the issue with this is always the efficiency.
> For the record, I don't like fat everything-but-the-kitchen-sink
> interface too. Same as I dislike mutating functions. Sorry, Jeff.
To be clear, I'm not opposed to an immutable super_string -- I agree that
would make things nicer. However, I don't have the time or inclination to
write the core of a string class (is there a boost.const_string somewhere?).
The other thing I value highly working seamlessly with existing code that uses
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk