Re: [boost] [assert] Proposed patch

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-05 11:20:57

Gennaro Prota wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 15:12:43 +0200, Gennaro Prota
> <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> [something...]
>
> I always wonder how a lack of answers should be taken: (a) nobody
> disagrees (b) nobody agrees (c) nobody cares.
>
> Hint: (c) is impossible, as *I* care, and for that reason I'll take
> (a) by default ;)

BOOST_ASSERT wasn't supposed to be an improvement over assert, 
interface-wise. In my opinion, invalid assertions should be fixed; we should 
not alter BOOST_ASSERT to make them work.