Re: [boost] tr1/test_function_tricky trickier than needed

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-08 11:53:57

Peter Dimov wrote:
>> The only difference between this test and the "non-tricky" one is the
>> presence of those two lines.  The test is intentionally pedantic.
>
> It didn't occur to me to look at the non-tricky test. :-)
>
> Why did you decide to duplicate all non-tricky portions in the tricky
> test
> as well? We are running both.

Well originally they weren't supposed to be tricky: there was supposed to be 
one test that "concept checked" each TR1 section, when I found that Boost 
didn't support a few of the features, I just commented out those parts that 
Boost didn't support and made these the "non-tricky" tests, and the 
"complete" unmolested versions became the "tricky" tests.

John.