From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-08 11:14:03
John Maddock wrote:
>> I think that these two lines need to be moved to a separate test.
> The only difference between this test and the "non-tricky" one is the
> presence of those two lines. The test is intentionally pedantic.
It didn't occur to me to look at the non-tricky test. :-)
Why did you decide to duplicate all non-tricky portions in the tricky test
as well? We are running both.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk