|
Boost : |
From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-22 05:04:16
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:57:06 +0200, Gennaro Prota
<gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>I'm not a layer
LaWyer :-)
>[...]
>
>If we talk about *pure opinions* (for what they are worth) I'd like
>"subject to" or "subject to the terms of".
I forgot "Released under", which also looks attractive. And BTW, I've
never liked the fact that the local LICENSE_1_0.txt is just called
with its name, while the online version is referred to as "copy", as
if it were, so to speak, a second class version. I'd rather say:
"See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt, or
http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt"
Pedantically,
-- [ Gennaro Prota, C++ developer for hire ]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk