From: Bryan Ross (daerid_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-22 12:32:41
Just to clarify, my mail client does have reply-to-all. The unfortunate
thing is that Reply To All and Reply both go to boost_at_[hidden]
So there is my conundrum.
On 7/21/06, Jody Hagins <jody-boost-011304_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:42:41 -0700
> "Bryan Ross" <daerid_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > I for one am for this. A few times I've sent mails directly to the
> > author of a posting, and it's been a bit of an annoyance to
> > 1. Create a new message
> > 2. Copy/paste the address of the recipient
> > 3. Copy/paste the context of the message
> > 4. Finally type out the message.
> > The author of that article makes a good point about mail clients. Any
> > client worth its salt will have some sort of "Reply to All" feature.
> I haven't read it, and have no opinion either way, but if your mail
> client has "reply-to-all" why can't you "reply-to-all" and just remove
> the boost mailing list entry. That's a lot easier than the steps you
> say you use currently...
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk