Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-22 12:55:49

Next message: Kim Barrett: "[boost] [system] system-0.2 request for comments"
Previous message: Bryan Ross: "Re: [boost] Should we change the reply-to setting?"
In reply to: Bryan Ross: "Re: [boost] Should we change the reply-to setting?"
Next in thread: Sebastian Redl: "Re: [boost] Should we change the reply-to setting?"
Reply: Sebastian Redl: "Re: [boost] Should we change the reply-to setting?"

On 7/22/06, Bryan Ross <daerid_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Just to clarify, my mail client does have reply-to-all. The unfortunate
> thing is that Reply To All and Reply both go to boost_at_[hidden]
>
> So there is my conundrum.

Just tested here, mine too. (Gmail)

-- 
Felipe Magno de Almeida

Next message: Kim Barrett: "[boost] [system] system-0.2 request for comments"
Previous message: Bryan Ross: "Re: [boost] Should we change the reply-to setting?"
In reply to: Bryan Ross: "Re: [boost] Should we change the reply-to setting?"
Next in thread: Sebastian Redl: "Re: [boost] Should we change the reply-to setting?"
Reply: Sebastian Redl: "Re: [boost] Should we change the reply-to setting?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk