From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-22 17:37:01
On 7/22/06 4:13 PM, "Sebastian Redl" <sebastian.redl_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
>> Just tested here, mine too. (Gmail)
> Submit a bug report. This behaviour differs from the de-facto standard
> set by most other clients.
>From what I see from other responses in this thread, I'm not sure that there
really is a de-facto standard. It is implementation-defined which fields a
reply-to-all function should look at. A key point I'm trying to make is
that the "reply-to" field is supposed to override the "from" field, so you
shouldn't look at both fields when composing a reply-to-all.
-- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk