|
Boost : |
From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-24 09:24:32
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:15:57 -0400, "David Bergman" <davidb_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
>I like the idea of having such a (meta) construct in my programming
>portfolio, much like the "newtype" in Haskell
Not a bad name, though maybe a bit generic :-)
>Thus, its name should reflect that wider scope, such as
>"homorphic_type."
This begins to put more stress on operation and relation preserving.
And with the _type suffix it suggests a typedef in existing C++
practice.
-- [ Gennaro Prota, C++ developer for hire ]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk