From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-24 20:36:21
Gennaro Prota writes:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 23:19:13 -0400, David Abrahams
> <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>That doesn't gibe with
>>which seems to indicate that Borland is supposed to be supported.
> BTW, those pages are driving me crazy. One day I see Comeau, another
> day I don't. I've fixed 50% of the Digital Mars failures and, now that
> I wanted to attempt a complete support, it's no more there.
The presence of a particular compiler on the issues page is determined
by whether the corresponding toolset is declared as "required"
AFAIK, Digital Mars was ever on the list of required toolsets; I
_think_ its temporary presence on the page was cause by a recent
breakage of the explicit markup file.
> Am I missing something or the set of supported compiler/lib/platform
> combinations is a bit erratic?
It's not. It's definitely not being changed without a notice to the
> Furthermore, may I ask what does "STLport 5.1.0" without further
> qualifications mean?
In "dmc-8_49b-stlport-5_1_0", it's STLport 5.1.0 RC1.
> I have RC1 and usually I'm not even able to
> reproduce the error messages.
Hmm, let us know if we can help to track these down.
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk