From: Paul Giaccone (paulg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-25 08:03:44
Johan Råde wrote:
> I agree that having the three functions
> is_infinite (or maybe is_infinity)
> is negative_infinity
> is a good idea.
One minor refinement to this list:
is_plus_infinity and is_minus_infinity
is_positive_infinity and is_negative_infinity
rather than mixing the terminology. The former pair is probably better
as the names are more concise.
Sorry for repeating myself in my last past - I hadn't read Johan's posting.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk