Re: [boost] is_nan

From: Paul Giaccone (paulg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-25 08:03:44

Johan Råde wrote:
> I agree that having the three functions
>
>      is_infinite (or maybe is_infinity)
>      is_plus_infinity
>      is negative_infinity
>
> is a good idea.
>   
One minor refinement to this list:

Have either:
    is_plus_infinity and is_minus_infinity
or
    is_positive_infinity and is_negative_infinity

rather than mixing the terminology. The former pair is probably better 
as the names are more concise.

Sorry for repeating myself in my last past - I hadn't read Johan's posting.