Re: [boost] [endian] Comments on Endian 0.5

From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard (jbms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-25 19:09:17

Dave Dribin <dave-ml_at_[hidden]> writes:

> [snip]

> Well, if I haven't convinced you by this point, hopefully at you'll  
> at least consider using a #define to disable constructors for those  
> people that *do* find a real-world use for such classes in unions.

Perhaps the solution is to support both use cases by having a separate
type for each of the two use cases.

-- 
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard