From: Wang Weiwei (wwwang_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-09 03:13:25
Hello Matias Capeletto,
The library is exactly what I was finding several days ago.
The first impression it gives me is that it's quite well documented.
>Boost.Bimap, my SoC project is ready to confront the list.
>The project is being mentored by Joaquín López Muñoz. I want
>to publicly thank him.
>With Boost.Bimap you can create associative containers where
>both types can be used as key. You can think a bimap<X,Y> as
>a merge of a std::map<X,Y> and a std::map<Y,X>. The learning
>curve of bimap is almost zero if you know how to use standard
>The original project that encompasses the creation of a one to
>one bidirectional map has been extended into a framework that
>extends the standard mapping scheme. A bimap is a very flexible
>and powerful container, but the interface of the library allows
>a user to use it out of the box.
>The project information, docs and sources can be found here:
>I will be very pleased if you can make some spare time to review
>the interface, design, implementation and documentation of this
>library and comment on it.
>Because it is better to go clean from the beginning, these are
>some of the questions that will surely rise a discussion.
>* Do you like the usage interface?
>* In relation with Boost.MultiIndex, Do you think that it is
> worth to have a bidirectional map library in Boost, that trades
> generality for a better specialized user interface?
> (Because this library was encouraged by the boost mentors the
> answer will surely be yes, but it is a nice discussion to have)
>* Do you like the extended mapping framework?
> Do you think it is intuitive for someone with a stl background?
>* What do you think of the design of operator?
> Is there a better way to be coherent with the stl that does not imply
> throwing exceptions?
>* What is your evaluation of the implementation?
> I am very interested in your reaction to the zero-overhead achieved
> by the almost-standard mutant_relation class, and the standard
> compliant label that this library acquires by including the
> standard_relation class.
> A big part of the library implementation is ContainerAdaptor.
> Do you deem Boost.ContainerAdaptor worth eventually proposing to
>Looking forward to getting your feedback,
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk