Boost logo

Boost :

From: Hubert Holin (Hubert.Holin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-17 08:14:34

Johan RÃ¥de <rade <at>> writes:

> Output is consistent with C99. (In particular, negative NaN is
> written as "-nan".

Paris (U.E.), le 17/08/2006


*Negative* Not-A-Number? What is such a beast, and what should
it be used for? Next, I vote for an Octonionic Not-A-Number! And
I definitely want a notation for the elements of the Stone-Chech
compactification of a set which are not in the base set... ;-)


Hubert Holin

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at