From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-19 08:19:12
"Matthias Troyer" <troyer_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
Matthias Troyer wrote
> Does this mean that the name will be derived, like in m/s^2 ? Or that
> there is no unit symbol at all that can be printed? Again this seems
> to be a property of the unit of the quantity. Wouldn't unnamed unit
> be a better name?
Actually on reflection maybe unnamed is better..
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk