Re: [boost] [regex] patch for config/platform/hpux.hpp

From: Boris Gubenko (Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-22 14:37:24

John Maddock wrote:
>
> Will do, but shouldn't
>

Thank you!

>> < #if !(defined(__HP_aCC) && defined(_INCLUDE__STDC_A1_SOURCE))
>> < #  define BOOST_NO_SWPRINTF
>> < #  define BOOST_NO_CWCTYPE
>> < #endif
>
> Be #if !(defined(__HP_aCC) && !defined(_INCLUDE__STDC_A1_SOURCE)) ?
>

No, I don't think so. The original condition says: don't define
BOOST_NO_SWPRINTF and BOOST_NO_CWCTYPE macros when compiling with aCC
with _INCLUDE__STDC_A1_SOURCE macro defined. This macro exposes I18N
features added in 11i. On appropriate platforms, aCC predefines
this macro.

Thanks again,
  Boris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Cc: "Boris Gubenko" <Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [regex] patch for config/platform/hpux.hpp

> Boris Gubenko wrote:
>>  The patch also enables native swprintf and cwctype when
>>  _INCLUDE__STDC_A1_SOURCE macro is defined (on ia64, aCC
>>  predefines this macro).
>>
>>  The hpux.hpp header is the same in RC_1_34 and HEAD and I'd
>>  like the patch to be committed to both, if possible.
>
> Will do, but shouldn't
>
>> < #if !(defined(__HP_aCC) && defined(_INCLUDE__STDC_A1_SOURCE))
>> < #  define BOOST_NO_SWPRINTF
>> < #  define BOOST_NO_CWCTYPE
>> < #endif
>
> Be #if !(defined(__HP_aCC) && !defined(_INCLUDE__STDC_A1_SOURCE)) ?
>
> Thanks, John.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>