From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-29 15:39:05
"Deane Yang" <deane_yang_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Andy Little wrote:
>> "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>> I agree on being able to generate new unit types. The 'physics only' view
>>> the world isn't very interesting to me.
>> That's quite funny, given that time is a physical quantity.
> So? Just because time is one of the quantities I'm going to use, I
> should use a full physical dimension library?
Kind of goes against the argument that money 'Units' is essential in a physical
quantities library though don't it?
> Ben appears to have implemented a core library that I believe has a much
> broader range of applications than a physical dimensions library. I have
> reason to believe that somewhere inside your library, you have the same
> thing implemented.
That is not now or for the foreeable future a goal of Quan.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk