From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-06 19:19:33
"Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> writes:
> So all in all I reckon Boost.Fusion is quite cool :-). Of course it is probably
> not as good performance wise,
I don't know why you say "of course." Just as STL iteration can be
faster than a hand-coded loop, in MPL we did several things that can
make it quite a bit faster to use the high-level abstractions than to
do the naive hand-coded version. The same thing could be true of Fusion.
> but I am not too concerned about performance and
A welcome change ;-)
> it is more interesting to do it this way..
And more maintainable. And more understandable. And... :)
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk