From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-09 04:40:53
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> "Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> So all in all I reckon Boost.Fusion is quite cool :-). Of course it is
>> not as good performance wise,
> I don't know why you say "of course." Just as STL iteration can be
> faster than a hand-coded loop, in MPL we did several things that can
> make it quite a bit faster to use the high-level abstractions than to
> do the naive hand-coded version. The same thing could be true of Fusion.
Looking at the assembler output from my quan::fusion::dot_product function when
optimised in VC8, it looks like the optimisation is near perfect FWIW.
I love fusion !
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk