From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-08 00:06:25
"Sebastian Redl" <sebastian.redl_at_[hidden]> writes:
> This implementation must exist within Boost, i.e. it must be
> completely contained within Boost.
Not if you put any stock in past Boost discussions and the intention
behind Boost. We've discussed this many times and we've always said
that a library whose implementation just happens to be as a C++
wrapper over code available elsewhere could be valuable and
appropriate for Boost.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk