Re: [boost] is_base_and_derived instantiated from within derived classdefinition

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-11 08:17:00

Zak Kipling wrote:
>> From discussion on the above bug page, it appears unclear whether
>> this
> or not this code is actually legal... has the patch broken something
> which should be expected to work, or are the existing versions of gcc
> and Comeau accepting illegal code?

It looks borderline to me: I suspect that gcc is correct in complaining 
about this, of course that doesn't mean it *has* to diagnose this as an 
error, simply that it is probably permitted to do so.

Any other opinions?

John.