From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-11 08:17:00
Zak Kipling wrote:
>> From discussion on the above bug page, it appears unclear whether
> or not this code is actually legal... has the patch broken something
> which should be expected to work, or are the existing versions of gcc
> and Comeau accepting illegal code?
It looks borderline to me: I suspect that gcc is correct in complaining
about this, of course that doesn't mean it *has* to diagnose this as an
error, simply that it is probably permitted to do so.
Any other opinions?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk