From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-11 09:04:30
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Zak Kipling wrote:
>>> From discussion on the above bug page, it appears unclear whether
>> or not this code is actually legal... has the patch broken something
>> which should be expected to work, or are the existing versions of gcc
>> and Comeau accepting illegal code?
> It looks borderline to me: I suspect that gcc is correct in complaining
> about this, of course that doesn't mean it *has* to diagnose this as an
> error, simply that it is probably permitted to do so.
> Any other opinions?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk