Re: [boost] [fusion] More quanfusion

From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-13 20:00:19

"Joel de Guzman" <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:eea4i0$8lq$1_at_sea.gmane.org...

> Some of these elements you mentioned do have generic appeal.
> static_value and advance_iterator looks general enough. plus, minus
> etc, have overlaps over other "functional" libraries;

So What? Only Boost.Typeof  binds compile time types to function signatures.

F* the "functional" type deduction schemes, including mine,lambda, phoenix,

Boost.Typeof  provides a common syntax via the function return type, and  is the 
future.

(Apologies to the 12 year olds reading the list.)

fusion *must* have type deduction, and Boost.Typeof is the placeholder.

regards
Andy Little