Re: [boost] [fusion] More quanfusion

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-13 20:32:45

Andy Little wrote:
> "Joel de Guzman" <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote
>> Some of these elements you mentioned do have generic appeal.
>> static_value and advance_iterator looks general enough. plus, minus
>> etc, have overlaps over other "functional" libraries; fusion seems
>> not to be the right place for it.
> 
> Fusion is the right place to get rid of manual type deduction.  I strongly 
> believe this.

Can you say why?

Cheers,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net