Re: [boost] [fusion] More quanfusion

From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-13 20:19:53

"Joel de Guzman" <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote
> Some of these elements you mentioned do have generic appeal.
> static_value and advance_iterator looks general enough. plus, minus
> etc, have overlaps over other "functional" libraries; fusion seems
> not to be the right place for it.

Fusion is the right place to get rid of manual type deduction.  I strongly 
believe this.

regards
Andy Little