From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-17 09:08:01
Damien Fisher wrote:
> While this might only be slightly annoying, I can't help but think
> that the semantics of __declspec(dllexport) within a non-DLL are
> undefined at best.
__declspec(dllexport) is well-defined in an EXE, it declares the functions
as exported. You can then link to them from the DLLs if you like. Its use in
the serialization library is probably unintended, though.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk