Re: [boost] [intrusive] Intrusive containers library strikes back

From: Bruno Martínez (br1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-17 11:53:48

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 04:12:03 -0300, Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]>  
wrote:

> If someone needs/wants more features, now's the time to request them!

I think intrusive containers would be useful.  There was a separate  
initiative that added intrusiveness to the multi index library.  I think  
it would be better to fold the many STL remakes that are popping up  
(pointer containers, intrusive containers/shared mem containers) into  
multi index than repeat the effort everywhere.  Case in point: what do I  
do if I need a pointer-sharedmem-bimap?

Bruno