Re: [boost] wgcc 2.0 RC1 released

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-19 10:06:50

"Duft Markus" <Markus.Duft_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Hi again!
>  
> For all interested in native Windows binaries built with Autotools and
> mnay other interesting things:

I'm not sure whether this is on-topic for Boost; it seems of somewhat
borderline relevance.  However, now that you've started the thread,
one obvious question leaps to mind: why would anyone want to use wgcc
in lieu of Cygwin or MinGW gcc?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com