Re: [boost] wgcc 2.0 RC1 released

From: David Klein (dave_chp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-19 16:59:19

David Abrahams wrote:
> "Duft Markus" <Markus.Duft_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>   
>> Hi again!
>>  
>> For all interested in native Windows binaries built with Autotools and
>> mnay other interesting things:
>>     
>
> I'm not sure whether this is on-topic for Boost; it seems of somewhat
> borderline relevance.  However, now that you've started the thread,
> one obvious question leaps to mind: why would anyone want to use wgcc
> in lieu of Cygwin or MinGW gcc?
>
>   
hi all,

i try to get 'distcc' (running on cygwin) compiling with vc71 + vc8.
i can't switch to gcc, and i don't want to buy 'incredibuild'.

btw, i only found out about wgcc because i'm reading the boost lists :)

--
regards,
dave