Re: [boost] wgcc 2.0 RC1 released

From: Duft Markus (Markus.Duft_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-20 01:50:10

There are plans to get distcc working on interix with wgcc, but these plans are somewhere in the future. But on the other hand it cannot be too complicated, since wgcc should behave like gcc ;o) If you give it a try, i would be really happy about feedback.

P.S.: I knew that people would have interest if they only knew about the project ;o)

Cheers, Markus 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] Im Auftrag von David Klein
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. September 2006 22:59
An: boost_at_[hidden]
Betreff: Re: [boost] wgcc 2.0 RC1 released

David Abrahams wrote:
> "Duft Markus" <Markus.Duft_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>   
>> Hi again!
>>  
>> For all interested in native Windows binaries built with Autotools 
>> and mnay other interesting things:
>>     
>
> I'm not sure whether this is on-topic for Boost; it seems of somewhat 
> borderline relevance.  However, now that you've started the thread, 
> one obvious question leaps to mind: why would anyone want to use wgcc 
> in lieu of Cygwin or MinGW gcc?
>
>   
hi all,

i try to get 'distcc' (running on cygwin) compiling with vc71 + vc8.
i can't switch to gcc, and i don't want to buy 'incredibuild'.

btw, i only found out about wgcc because i'm reading the boost lists :)

--
regards,
dave
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost