From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-22 19:35:16
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> AFAICT the name ftag should be changed to something more descriptive
> and more certainly unique, e.g. boost_fusion_iterator_tag. Is there
> a reason it needs to be so short?
Why make such a trivial change to the interface post review? AFAICS now is too
late, and will cause unnecessary pain to users.. like myself.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk