Re: [boost] [fusion] ftag

From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-22 19:35:16

"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:87fyenkjh9.fsf_at_pereiro.luannocracy.com...
>
> AFAICT the name ftag should be changed to something more descriptive
> and more certainly unique, e.g. boost_fusion_iterator_tag.  Is there
> a reason it needs to be so short?

Why make such a trivial  change to the  interface post review? AFAICS now is too 
late, and will cause unnecessary pain to users.. like myself.

regards
Andy Little