Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-19 10:40:34

Next message: Anthony Williams: "[boost] C++ Standards Committee Threading papers (was: [threads] Permission given to change to Boost.License)"
Previous message: Aristid Breitkreuz: "Re: [boost] Work that has been done on Unicode"
Next in thread: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [fusion] ftag"
Reply: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [fusion] ftag"
Reply: Andy Little: "Re: [boost] [fusion] ftag"

AFAICT the name ftag should be changed to something more descriptive
and more certainly unique, e.g. boost_fusion_iterator_tag. Is there
a reason it needs to be so short?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Anthony Williams: "[boost] C++ Standards Committee Threading papers (was: [threads] Permission given to change to Boost.License)"
Previous message: Aristid Breitkreuz: "Re: [boost] Work that has been done on Unicode"
Next in thread: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [fusion] ftag"
Reply: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [fusion] ftag"
Reply: Andy Little: "Re: [boost] [fusion] ftag"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk