Re: [boost] property tree library not in CVS?

From: Janek Kozicki (janek_listy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-05 15:16:14

Jeff Garland said:     (by the date of Thu, 05 Oct 2006 06:34:00 -0700)

> As I've done in the past, I'll really encourage you *not* wait to finish the 
> docs to put the code in CVS.  To help us avoid a repeat of 1.34 we need 
> libraries going into 1.35 to be in CVS and regression tested as early in the 
> cycle as possible.  New authors tend to underestimate the amount of 
> time/effort to resolve porting issues -- the key fact that there is often a 24 
> hour wait to see if fixes actually resolve issues.

Good point!

Marcin, please put your code in CVS, so that you can fix the regression
tests, and finish docs later!

-- 
Janek Kozicki                                                         |