From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-05 09:34:00
Marcin Kalicinski wrote:
> Hi Janek,
> The result of the review stated that the library needs to fix several
> issues, including documentation, before the library is added to the CVS. The
> status at the moment is that the code and tests are ready (see boost-sandbox
> CVS), but I still need to update the documentation.
As I've done in the past, I'll really encourage you *not* wait to finish the
docs to put the code in CVS. To help us avoid a repeat of 1.34 we need
libraries going into 1.35 to be in CVS and regression tested as early in the
cycle as possible. New authors tend to underestimate the amount of
time/effort to resolve porting issues -- the key fact that there is often a 24
hour wait to see if fixes actually resolve issues.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk