Re: [boost] [GIL] - too complex?

From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-06 16:46:11

"Lubomir Bourdev" <lbourdev_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:B55F4112A7B48C44AF51E442990015C04C9940_at_namail1.corp.adobe.com...

> Only the last ones have corresponding models. Although in theory one could 
> represent things like video, 3D or lightfields as N-dimensional constructs, 
> there are no existing models for them nor algorithms that take them.
>
> So one thought I have been toying with is removing the N-dimensional concepts 
> until we end up needing them.
> Or maybe even removing the 2D concepts?
>
> That will cut down on the documentation with virtually no change in the code. 
> Thoughts?

Well FWIW the  transform code you showed looks quite interesting, but I would 
guess that you should use 4 x4 matrices. This would allow arbitrary 3D 
transformation of the Points in the Image (perspective, rotation round the x and 
y axes, assuming the image is in the xy plane), to interpolate them into 3D.

regards
Andy Little