From: Walter Landry (wlandry_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-09 01:30:56
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Another question: how about Fast Fourier Transform? is it by
> > definition already out of the scope of your library, or maybe not?
> Yes, definitely outside the scope, and also patent protected I believe.
FFT is way too old to be patent protected. There are a number of
free, high quality implementations.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk