From: Janek Kozicki (janek_listy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-10 01:49:51
Jeremy Pack said: (by the date of Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:04:01 -0600)
> 1 - I will check through the extended_type_info documentation to see
> if it will be able to provide each of the requirements that I feel
> necessary. It sounds like it does.
Also Robert mentioned that the real magic (the one that needs to be
separated) is hidden in iserialer.hpp. However I was unable to find this
file, my closest match was ./archive/detail/iserializer.hpp :)
> One important question: should we avoid requiring RTTI?
IMHO one more option for the users is good. But better first have a
working prototype, then add new features, like no_rtti support.
-- Janek Kozicki |
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk