Re: [boost] Boost libraries after C++0x acceptance

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-10 13:05:18

Jeff F wrote:
> This begs the question of how can we get compiler suppliers to
> include "a copy" of boost with their compilers? That would certainly
> remove the single largest barrier to adoption, would it not? It
> certainly would in the company that I just joined.

Borland used to do that, but since it was a "third party library" and not 
officially supported, and a little out of date (inevitable), I'm not sure 
how much it helped.  Sigh :-(

John.