Re: [boost] [range/iterator] operator[] forwarding

From: Janek Kozicki (janek_listy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-12 13:31:34

Thorsten Ottosen said:     (by the date of Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:48:56 +0200)

> >>We could add operator() which would return operator[]()'s result by value.
> >>
> >>Is anybody opposed to that?
> > 
> > 
> > Probably.  What is the point of doing that?
> 
> It would fix our users problem, so he can use () to do what he want.
> 

More consequence then, and forward all operators.

But in this scenario some unintended behaviour can appear related to
forwarding not intended by the user.

-- 
Janek Kozicki                                                         |