From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-12 19:05:49
Janek Kozicki <janek_listy_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Thorsten Ottosen said: (by the date of Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:48:56 +0200)
>> >>We could add operator() which would return operator()'s result by value.
>> >>Is anybody opposed to that?
>> > Probably. What is the point of doing that?
>> It would fix our users problem, so he can use () to do what he want.
> More consequence then, and forward all operators.
Sorry, I can't parse that.
> But in this scenario some unintended behaviour can appear related to
> forwarding not intended by the user.
loster and loster.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk